<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ok &#8230; It has been proven without a doubt I know nothing about photography.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rxaonline.com/blog/2007/11/26/ok-it-has-been-proven-without-a-doubt-i-know-nothing-about-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rxaonline.com/blog/2007/11/26/ok-it-has-been-proven-without-a-doubt-i-know-nothing-about-photography/</link>
	<description>"I create feelings in others that they themselves don't understand" - Lightning McQueen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.rxaonline.com/blog/2007/11/26/ok-it-has-been-proven-without-a-doubt-i-know-nothing-about-photography/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rxaonline.com/blog/2007/11/26/ok-it-has-been-proven-without-a-doubt-i-know-nothing-about-photography/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Not to put a damper on your shots, but Explore isn&#039;t always about quality photos; half the time it&#039;s a popularity contest -- the sheer number of crappy flower and generic female shots should attest to that.

There *are* a lot of good shots that make it into there, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to put a damper on your shots, but Explore isn&#8217;t always about quality photos; half the time it&#8217;s a popularity contest &#8212; the sheer number of crappy flower and generic female shots should attest to that.</p>
<p>There *are* a lot of good shots that make it into there, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rxa</title>
		<link>http://www.rxaonline.com/blog/2007/11/26/ok-it-has-been-proven-without-a-doubt-i-know-nothing-about-photography/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>rxa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rxaonline.com/blog/2007/11/26/ok-it-has-been-proven-without-a-doubt-i-know-nothing-about-photography/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>My meaning was I didn&#039;t think the shot was worthy. Sorry, I&#039;m tired and didn&#039;t explain myself properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My meaning was I didn&#8217;t think the shot was worthy. Sorry, I&#8217;m tired and didn&#8217;t explain myself properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Annable</title>
		<link>http://www.rxaonline.com/blog/2007/11/26/ok-it-has-been-proven-without-a-doubt-i-know-nothing-about-photography/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Annable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rxaonline.com/blog/2007/11/26/ok-it-has-been-proven-without-a-doubt-i-know-nothing-about-photography/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Why would being on flickr&#039;s explore mean you know nothing about photography? It basically means you&#039;ve had a lot of comments/favourites for your shot. My assumption would be that you would need to know something to be included in the &quot;interesting&quot; photos of the day. Weird title for this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would being on flickr&#8217;s explore mean you know nothing about photography? It basically means you&#8217;ve had a lot of comments/favourites for your shot. My assumption would be that you would need to know something to be included in the &#8220;interesting&#8221; photos of the day. Weird title for this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
